MJF 3D printing service — production nylon, batch-consistent, ships in days.
HP Multi Jet Fusion is the production workhorse in our catalog. Strong isotropic parts in Nylon PA12 and PA11, batch-consistent across every print, and cost-effective up to thousands of parts. The technology that bridges prototype quality with production volume.
MJF 3D printing service — production nylon, batch-consistent, ships in days.
HP Multi Jet Fusion is the production workhorse in our catalog. Strong isotropic parts in Nylon PA12 and PA11, batch-consistent across every print, and cost-effective up to thousands of parts. The technology that bridges prototype quality with production volume.
Why MJF wins for production
Unlike FDM, MJF parts have consistent strength in every direction. No weak Z-axis to design around, no layer delamination under load.
Part number 1 and part number 500 have the same dimensions, the same strength, and the same finish. Validated across thousands of production runs.
Parts are self-supporting in a bed of powder. Internal channels, undercuts, and complex assemblies print as a single piece. No support removal labor, no support witness marks.
Below 2,000 identical parts, MJF beats injection molding on total cost because there is zero tooling. Above 2,000, injection molding wins — and we will tell you that.
MJF material options
Chemical resistant, thermally stable to 170°C, dimensionally consistent. Our most-ordered production material. Food-contact grades available.
Higher impact strength and elongation at break. Derived from castor oil — 100% bio-based if your brief demands sustainable sourcing.
40% glass fiber for stiffness and heat resistance. Replaces machined aluminum brackets in many structural applications.
Production workflow
Quote
Upload files to the instant quoter or submit a ticket for complex jobs.
Check out online or get a custom invoice once specs are locked.
File review
Files in by 3:30pm — confirmed same day.
File issue? You get specific feedback — walls, orientation, supports.
Production
5,000+ parts a week off the floor. Every job has a named technician.
Track status via chatbot. Automatic notification when it ships.
QA
Every part initialed by the technician who inspected it.
Doesn’t pass? Reprinted immediately. No charge, no back-and-forth.
Dispatch
Notified the moment it ships or is ready for pickup.
Technologies & build volumes
Technology comparison
More services
Explore what else we build
Large Format 3D Printing Service
Parts up to 1200mm on FGF and 1000mm on Industrial SLA. Architectural models, trade show props, full-scale prototypes.
Rapid Prototyping Service
Functional prototypes in 2–3 business days. FDM, SLA, MJF — 23 materials. Same engineer from prototype through production.
SLA 3D Printing Service
Smooth-finish SLA 3D printing in 14 resins. Visual prototypes, snap-fit validation, and presentation models down to 25μm layers.
Injection Molding Alternative
Skip the $30K-$100K tooling investment. Production-grade FDM, SLA, and MJF parts with zero mold cost and 3–5 day lead times.
FDM 3D Printing Service
FDM 3D printing in 6 thermoplastics — PLA, PETG, ABS, ASA, PC CF, TPU. The fastest and most cost-effective way to get functional parts in your hand.
Parts & Prototyping
15+ materials, 1-50 parts, delivered to spec in days.
Production Runs
50 to 5,000+ parts per week. Consistent tolerances across every unit.
XL 3D Printing
Parts up to ~1200mm — printed whole or split-and-assemble.
.jpg)
Design Engineering
DfAM optimization, reverse engineering, geometry tuning.
Plan Your Project
Tools to plan your build
Check shipping transit times, estimate lead times by technology, and review design guidelines before you upload — so your parts print right the first time.
Check Transit Time
Enter your zip code to see how fast parts arrive from our Brooklyn facility.
Related Resources
Keep exploring
Related Services
SLA 3D Printing Service
Smooth-finish SLA 3D printing in 14 resins. Visual prototypes, snap-fit validation, and presentation models down to 25μm layers.
Injection Molding Alternative
Skip the $30K-$100K tooling investment. Production-grade FDM, SLA, and MJF parts with zero mold cost and 3–5 day lead times.
Rapid Prototyping Service
Functional prototypes in 2–3 business days. FDM, SLA, MJF — 23 materials. Same engineer from prototype through production.
Related Comparisons
FDM vs MJF — cost-effective prototyping vs production-grade nylon.
Choose FDM for early prototyping, concept models, and large parts where cost matters more than surface finish. Choose MJF when you need production-grade mechanical properties, batch consistency, and parts that can ship to end customers.
SLA vs MJF — precision and finish vs production-grade strength.
Choose SLA when surface quality and dimensional precision are the priority — client presentations, snap-fit prototypes, and parts that need painting. Choose MJF when mechanical performance and batch consistency matter — production parts, functional testing, and parts that ship to customers.
MJF vs injection molding — when does 3D printing make more sense?
Choose MJF when volume is under 2,000-5,000 parts, when you need parts in days instead of months, when geometry is complex (undercuts, internal channels), or when your design is still evolving. Choose injection molding when volume exceeds 5,000+ parts of the same geometry and your design is frozen.
SLS vs MJF — two powder-bed nylon processes, different trade-offs.
Choose MJF for faster batch throughput, smoother as-built surface, and more consistent mechanical properties across a build. Choose SLS when you need specific specialty powders (glass-filled with certain fill percentages, TPU powders, or carbon-filled variants) that are not available in MJF yet.
MJF vs urethane casting — two paths to low-volume production.
Choose MJF when you need parts in a week, when material consistency matters, when the design is still evolving, or when geometry has undercuts or internal channels. Choose urethane casting when you need rubber-like elastomers not available in MJF, when the part has to match a specific shore hardness spec, or when the volume is in the 100–500 range and the design is frozen.
Nylon PA12 vs aluminum — when printed nylon replaces machined metal.
Switch to Nylon PA12 Glass Filled when: the part does not see sustained high temperatures (above 120°C), does not need to conduct heat or electricity, has complex internal geometry, or needs to be lightweight. Stay with machined aluminum when: the part operates in high heat, must carry electrical current, needs precision under ±0.1mm, or must be compatible with aggressive chemicals that degrade nylon.
Related Insights
3D Printing for Engineers: A Complete Working Reference
A technical reference for mechanical and product engineers using 3D printing — materials, tolerances, design rules, and how to spec a 3D printed part on a drawing.
3D Printing vs Traditional Manufacturing: When to Use Each
A decision framework for when to use 3D printing vs injection molding, CNC machining, urethane casting, and sheet metal fabrication — based on volume, geometry, and lead time.
Related Materials
Nylon PA12
Strong, lightweight, chemical resistant. The standard for functional end-use parts. Excellent fatigue resistance and consistent mechanical properties.
Nylon PA11
Bio-based nylon with higher elongation and impact resistance. Ideal for parts requiring ductility and flexibility.
Nylon PA12 Glass Filled
40% glass-filled nylon. High stiffness and thermal stability for demanding structural applications.
Related Technologies
Ready to start production?
Upload your CAD file and get a quote in minutes — or talk to our engineers about your next production run.