FDM 3D Printing Service — Makelab 3D printing service
WORKHORSE

FDM 3D printing service — the cost-effective path to functional parts.

FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) is the 3D printing workhorse — fastest turnaround, lowest cost per part, and the broadest catalog of engineering thermoplastics. We run industrial FDM machines with 360 × 360 × 360mm build volume and six production-grade materials. Most prototypes ship in 2–3 business days.

2–3 days
Typical lead time
6
Engineering thermoplastics
360mm
Max part dimension
±0.2mm
Typical tolerance
01

When to choose FDM

When to choose FDMWhen to choose FDM
Functional prototypes on a budget

FDM is the cheapest 3D printing technology per cubic inch. When you need working prototypes and cost matters, this is almost always the right call.

Large parts in one piece

Our 360 × 360 × 360mm build volume is the largest in our standard catalog. Parts that would need splitting on SLA or MJF often print in one piece on FDM.

Engineering thermoplastics

PETG, ASA, PC CF, and ABS are real engineering materials with real mechanical spec sheets — not just prototype stand-ins. Parts that hold up in the field.

Jigs, fixtures, and tooling

Assembly line tooling, vacuum formers, soft jigs, inspection fixtures. FDM is the go-to for production-floor tooling because it is cheap, fast, and tough enough to last.

02

Our FDM material catalog

Our FDM material catalog
PLA — cheapest and easiest

Plant-based thermoplastic, prints reliably, dimensionally stable at room temperature. Use for concept models, display pieces, and fit-checks. Not for loaded parts or outdoor use.

PETG — the functional default

Tougher than PLA, chemically resistant, heat-stable to 70°C. Our most-ordered FDM material for functional brackets, housings, and mechanical prototypes.

ABS — injection mold matching

The legacy engineering thermoplastic. Slightly tougher than PETG, warps more, has that ABS smell. Order it when you need to match an existing injection-molded reference part.

ASA — outdoor and UV

Same mechanical profile as ABS with dramatically better UV stability. The material of choice for outdoor brackets, enclosures, and anything living in direct sun.

PC CF — engineering grade

Polycarbonate with chopped carbon fiber. Stiff, dimensionally stable, heat-stable to 150°C. Replaces machined aluminum for structural brackets at a fraction of the cost.

TPU — flexible

Shore 95A thermoplastic polyurethane. Flexes without breaking. Use for bumpers, grommets, soft-touch grips, and impact absorbers.

03

How FDM compares

How FDM compares
FDM vs SLA

FDM is cheaper, tougher, and available in more engineering thermoplastics. SLA has smoother surfaces and tighter tolerances. Choose FDM for functional parts, SLA for visual parts.

FDM vs MJF

FDM is cheaper and faster at low volumes. MJF is stronger, more consistent across a batch, and cheaper per part at higher volumes. Choose FDM for prototypes, MJF for production.

FDM vs CNC machining

FDM is faster to set up and handles complex geometry for free. CNC holds tighter tolerances and works in metals and hard polymers FDM cannot. Choose FDM for iterative prototypes, CNC for tight-tolerance final parts.

04

Production workflow

01Online

Quote

Upload files to the instant quoter or submit a ticket for complex jobs.

Check out online or get a custom invoice once specs are locked.

STLOBJ3MFSTEP
02File review

File review

Files in by 3:30pm — confirmed same day.

File issue? You get specific feedback — walls, orientation, supports.

03In production

Production

5,000+ parts a week off the floor. Every job has a named technician.

Track status via chatbot. Automatic notification when it ships.

043-point QA

QA

Every part initialed by the technician who inspected it.

Doesn’t pass? Reprinted immediately. No charge, no back-and-forth.

Pre-productionIn-processFinal delivery
05Dispatch

Dispatch

Notified the moment it ships or is ready for pickup.

Local pickupSame-day courierUS shippingInternational

Learn more about our full process →

05

Technologies & build volumes

Build Volume
360 mm360 mm360 mm360 × 360 × 360 mm
06

Technology comparison

FAST + PREMIUMSLOWER + PREMIUMFAST + AFFORDABLESLOWER + AFFORDABLELEAD TIME →COST →1 day7+ days$$$$$FDMMakelab
FDM

Fastest turnaround, lowest cost per part.

PLA, PETG, TPU, ASA, PC CF

Learn more

Plan Your Project

Tools to plan your build

Check shipping transit times, estimate lead times by technology, and review design guidelines before you upload — so your parts print right the first time.

Check Transit Time

Enter your zip code to see how fast parts arrive from our Brooklyn facility.

Related Resources

Keep exploring

Related Comparisons

FDM vs SLA — which 3D printing technology is right for your part?

Choose FDM when cost and speed matter most, or when you need tough engineering thermoplastics (PETG, ASA, PC CF) at larger build volumes. Choose SLA when surface finish, dimensional accuracy, or fine detail resolution is the priority — visual prototypes, snap-fit validation, and presentation models.

FDM vs MJF — cost-effective prototyping vs production-grade nylon.

Choose FDM for early prototyping, concept models, and large parts where cost matters more than surface finish. Choose MJF when you need production-grade mechanical properties, batch consistency, and parts that can ship to end customers.

FDM vs CNC — when to print plastic, when to mill it.

Choose FDM when geometry is complex (undercuts, lattices, internal channels), when volume is low, or when turnaround is the priority. Choose CNC when tolerances are tighter than ±0.1mm, when the material must be POM, PEEK, Ultem, or HDPE, or when surface finish has to be machined-smooth.

PLA vs ABS — the two classic FDM filaments compared.

Choose PLA for display models, concept prototypes, fit-checks, and any part that will live indoors at room temperature. Choose ABS when the part needs to survive mild impact, moderate heat (above 55°C), or when you need to match an existing injection-molded reference. For most modern FDM work, PETG is a better default than either — tougher than PLA, cleaner than ABS.

PETG vs ASA — indoor workhorse vs outdoor champion.

Choose PETG for indoor functional prototypes, chemical-resistant parts, housings, and brackets. It is the cheaper and easier-to-print option for most projects. Choose ASA whenever the part will see direct UV exposure — outdoor enclosures, rooftop brackets, garden tools, automotive exterior trim. ASA costs a bit more and warps during printing, but PETG will become brittle and discolor under sustained UV within a year.

Ready to start production?

Upload your CAD file and get a quote in minutes — or talk to our engineers about your next production run.