MJF comparison — Makelab 3D printing technologies

SLS vs MJF — two powder-bed nylon processes, different trade-offs.

SLS (Selective Laser Sintering) and MJF (HP Multi Jet Fusion) both produce production-grade nylon parts in a powder bed. They look similar in output, but the underlying physics are different — SLS uses a laser to fuse powder point by point, while MJF uses an inkjet head to deposit fusing agent across the entire layer at once. Those differences show up in surface finish, batch speed, and consistency. We run MJF because we believe it is the better fit for our production profile. Here is why.

Detailed comparison

Property-by-property breakdown

FactorMJFSLS
Fusing methodInkjet fusing agent + IR lampsCO2 laser point-by-point
Layer speedEntire layer at onceRaster scan (slower)
Surface finish (as-built)Smoother (10–15 Ra μm)Slightly rougher (15–25 Ra μm)
Typical batch timeFasterSlower at same build volume
Dimensional consistencyExcellent batch-to-batchVery good
PA12 tensile strength48 MPa48 MPa (similar)
Material catalogPA12, PA11, PA12 GFPA12, PA11, PA12 GF, TPU, specialty
Color optionsGrey, black (ours)Off-white

Our recommendation

Choose MJF for faster batch throughput, smoother as-built surface, and more consistent mechanical properties across a build. Choose SLS when you need specific specialty powders (glass-filled with certain fill percentages, TPU powders, or carbon-filled variants) that are not available in MJF yet.

Related Resources

Keep exploring

Related Comparisons

FDM vs MJF — cost-effective prototyping vs production-grade nylon.

Choose FDM for early prototyping, concept models, and large parts where cost matters more than surface finish. Choose MJF when you need production-grade mechanical properties, batch consistency, and parts that can ship to end customers.

SLA vs MJF — precision and finish vs production-grade strength.

Choose SLA when surface quality and dimensional precision are the priority — client presentations, snap-fit prototypes, and parts that need painting. Choose MJF when mechanical performance and batch consistency matter — production parts, functional testing, and parts that ship to customers.

Nylon PA12 vs PA11 — choosing the right MJF production material.

Choose PA12 for most production applications — brackets, housings, clips, and structural parts where stiffness and heat resistance matter. Choose PA11 when ductility and impact resistance are priorities — living hinges, snap-fits under repeated cycling, energy-absorbing components, and applications with sustainability requirements.

Nylon PA12 vs aluminum — when printed nylon replaces machined metal.

Switch to Nylon PA12 Glass Filled when: the part does not see sustained high temperatures (above 120°C), does not need to conduct heat or electricity, has complex internal geometry, or needs to be lightweight. Stay with machined aluminum when: the part operates in high heat, must carry electrical current, needs precision under ±0.1mm, or must be compatible with aggressive chemicals that degrade nylon.

Ready to start production?

Upload your CAD file and get a quote in minutes — or talk to our engineers about your next production run.