MJF comparison — Makelab 3D printing technologies

MJF vs urethane casting — two paths to low-volume production.

Urethane casting has been the go-to for low-volume production (10–500 parts) for decades. A silicone mold is cast from a master pattern, then polyurethane resin is poured into the mold to produce parts. MJF 3D printing arrived later and now competes directly in the same volume range — without the mold step. If you are evaluating how to get a few hundred production parts quickly, here is how the two processes compare.

Detailed comparison

Property-by-property breakdown

FactorMJF 3D PrintingUrethane Casting
First part lead time5 business days2–3 weeks (master + mold + pour)
Tooling cost$0$500–$3,000 (silicone master mold)
Part consistencyBatch-stableDegrades after 20–30 pulls (mold wear)
Material catalogNylon PA12, PA11, PA12 GFWide shore-range urethanes (30A–80D)
Geometric freedomUnlimited (undercuts, internal channels)Limited by mold pull direction
Best volume range1–2,000 identical parts50–500 identical parts
Cost at 100 parts$$$$$ (mold dominates at this volume)
Typical surface finishMatte, slightly grainyAs-cast smooth

Our recommendation

Choose MJF when you need parts in a week, when material consistency matters, when the design is still evolving, or when geometry has undercuts or internal channels. Choose urethane casting when you need rubber-like elastomers not available in MJF, when the part has to match a specific shore hardness spec, or when the volume is in the 100–500 range and the design is frozen.

Related Resources

Keep exploring

Related Comparisons

Ready to start production?

Upload your CAD file and get a quote in minutes — or talk to our engineers about your next production run.